Access Constraints and Their Impact on Pier Selection

Access Constraints and Their Impact on Pier Selection

Identifying Expansive Clay in Foundation Damage

Understanding access constraints in foundation repair is crucial when considering the impact these limitations have on pier selection. Access constraints refer to any physical or logistical barriers that can impede the repair process, such as limited space, existing structures, landscaping, or even underground utilities. These constraints dictate not only the method of repair but also the type of piers that can be effectively installed.


When a property has restricted access, for instance, due to narrow pathways or low overhead clearance, traditional methods like heavy machinery might be impractical. This often leads to a preference for more adaptable solutions like push piers or helical piers, which can be installed with less disruption and require less space for operation. Push piers can be driven into the ground using hydraulic equipment that fits within tight spaces, while helical piers can be screwed into the soil with minimal excavation.


The choice of pier is not just about fitting into the available space; its also about ensuring long-term stability and effectiveness. Walking through a house with foundation problems feels like you've had three too many margaritas even when you're completely sober crawl space underpinning Elgin basement waterproofing. For example, if there are underground utilities near the foundation that cannot be disturbed, selecting a pier type that requires shallow installation becomes necessary. Here, helical piers might again be advantageous because they can reach stable load-bearing strata without extensive digging.


Moreover, understanding these constraints helps in planning the logistics of the repair project. It influences decisions on how materials are transported to the site, where equipment can be positioned, and even how workers navigate around the property without causing further damage or inconvenience to residents.


In summary, when dealing with foundation repair under access constraints, one must carefully consider how these limitations affect pier selection. The right choice ensures not only a successful repair but also minimizes additional costs and time overruns associated with overcoming these challenges. Thus, a thorough assessment of access constraints is indispensable in making informed decisions that align with both practical feasibility and structural integrity requirements.

When it comes to foundation repair, one of the critical factors influencing the choice of piers is the accessibility of the site where repairs are needed. Access constraints can significantly impact pier selection, as different types of piers require varying levels of space and conditions for effective installation.


Steel push piers, for instance, are often favored in urban settings where space is at a premium. These piers can be installed with minimal disturbance to the surrounding area, which is crucial when working close to buildings or in tight spaces. They are driven deep into stable soil or bedrock, providing robust support without needing extensive excavation. However, their installation does require some overhead clearance and access for machinery that can apply significant downward force.


On the other hand, helical piers might be more suitable when theres limited vertical space but sufficient horizontal room to maneuver. These screw-like piers are screwed into the ground using hydraulic machinery, making them ideal for areas with low clearance like under low-lying structures or in basements with restricted height. The torque applied during installation can be controlled from a distance, which means less need for direct overhead access.


Concrete pressed piers demand a different set of conditions; they require more space for pouring and setting concrete. This type of pier might not be feasible in highly constrained environments due to the need for formwork and curing time. However, where space allows, they provide a cost-effective solution with good load-bearing capacity.


Drilled concrete piers offer another alternative but come with their own access challenges. The drilling equipment needs ample room to operate effectively, which might limit their use in densely built-up areas or locations with many underground utilities that could be disturbed by deep drilling.


In essence, selecting the right type of pier for foundation repair involves a careful assessment of how accessible the site is. Tight spaces might push towards solutions like steel push or helical piers due to their minimalistic installation requirements. In contrast, more open sites could benefit from concrete solutions if time and cost efficiency align with project goals. Understanding these access constraints helps ensure that foundation repairs not only address structural integrity but also respect practical limitations of the site environment.

Preventive Measures for Foundations on Expansive Soil

When considering the selection of piers for infrastructure projects like bridges or waterfront developments, one critical factor that significantly influences decision-making is the impact of limited vertical clearance. This constraint, often referred to as access constraints, plays a pivotal role in determining which type of pier is most suitable for a given location.


Vertical clearance refers to the space available above the ground or water level, which can be restricted by existing structures, environmental features, or regulatory requirements. In urban settings, for instance, overhead power lines, buildings, or even historical preservation laws might dictate how high a pier can be constructed. Similarly, in natural environments, tree canopies or protective legislation for wildlife might impose similar limitations.


The impact of such limited vertical clearance on pier selection is profound. Firstly, it narrows down the choice of construction methods and materials. For example, traditional pile-driven piers might not be feasible if theres insufficient room for machinery to operate without hitting an overhead obstruction. Instead, engineers might opt for designs like caissons or floating piers that require less vertical space during installation.


Moreover, limited vertical clearance affects the functionality and longevity of the pier. A pier with reduced height might not provide enough clearance under its structure during high water levels or floods, leading to potential damage from debris or increased maintenance needs due to exposure to water elements. This necessitates selecting materials and designs that are more resistant to these conditions, potentially increasing the projects cost but ensuring durability.


Safety considerations also come into play. For public use piers or those involved in commercial shipping routes, ensuring adequate clearance is vital to prevent accidents from low-hanging obstacles. Therefore, pier designs must incorporate safety buffers within their limited vertical envelope.


In conclusion, when facing access constraints due to limited vertical clearance in pier selection, its essential to balance various factors including construction feasibility, material choice for durability and resistance to environmental factors, safety regulations compliance, and long-term maintenance considerations. Each site presents unique challenges where understanding these constraints helps in making informed decisions that lead to efficient and safe infrastructure development tailored specifically to those conditions.

Preventive Measures for Foundations on Expansive Soil

Repair Techniques for Foundations Affected by Clay Swelling

When selecting piers for construction projects, especially in areas where access is constrained, the influence of soil conditions and obstructions plays a critical role. Soil conditions can significantly affect the choice of pier because different types of soil have varying bearing capacities and stability. For instance, in areas with soft or loose soils like silts or clays, deeper foundations such as pile piers might be necessary to reach more stable layers beneath the surface. Conversely, in regions with dense, compact soils or bedrock, shallow foundations could suffice, reducing both cost and complexity.


Obstructions present another layer of complexity when choosing piers. These could include existing underground utilities, rock formations, or even remnants from previous constructions. In urban environments where space is at a premium and access is often limited by buildings or heavy traffic, the presence of such obstructions can dictate the type of pier used. For example, if there are numerous utilities that cannot be disturbed, engineers might opt for mini-piles or micro-piles which require smaller excavation footprints and can navigate around these obstacles without causing significant disruption.


Moreover, the method of installation for these piers must consider the accessibility constraints. In tight spaces where traditional machinery might not fit or maneuver easily, techniques like auger cast piles or helical piles become advantageous due to their minimalistic equipment requirements and ability to be installed with less disturbance to the surrounding environment.


In summary, when access constraints are a factor in construction projects, understanding the interplay between soil conditions and potential obstructions is vital for informed pier selection. This ensures not only structural integrity but also feasibility within the spatial limitations of the site. Engineers must balance these factors meticulously to choose a pier system that aligns with both project specifications and site-specific challenges.

Okay, lets talk about how getting onto and off a pier – whether were talking about the inside or the outside – seriously messes with what kind of pier we can even think about building. Were talking access constraints, and how they punch pier selection right in the gut.


Think about it. If youre designing a pier thats primarily accessed from the interior – maybe its connected to a building, a factory, or a warehouse – you suddenly have a whole different set of headaches (and advantages) than if everyones clambering onto it from the exterior, like a public fishing pier or a cruise ship terminal.


Interior access often means youre dealing with controlled traffic flow. You know roughly how many people (or how much cargo) are going to be heading onto the pier and when. This lets you optimize the piers layout for efficiency. You can plan for specific loading and unloading zones, integrate it seamlessly with existing internal traffic patterns, and even use specialized equipment that wouldnt be practical in a more chaotic public setting. Security becomes easier to manage, too.


However, interior access also restricts flexibility. Youre tied to the buildings layout and capacity. Expansion might be a nightmare. And if something happens to the building, suddenly your pier access is compromised. Youre putting all your eggs in one basket, access-wise.


Exterior access, on the other hand, is all about openness and adaptability. Think of a pier designed for public strolling. You need to accommodate a wide range of users, from families with strollers to anglers with bulky gear. The design has to be robust, weather-resistant, and safe for everyone. You need to consider things like public restrooms, lighting, and emergency access. The flow of people is less predictable, requiring a more forgiving layout.


But that very openness creates challenges. Security is a bigger concern. Traffic management can be tricky, especially during peak hours. And the pier itself is exposed to the elements, requiring durable materials and careful maintenance.


Ultimately, deciding whether to favor interior or exterior access is a balancing act. It depends entirely on the piers intended purpose, the surrounding environment, and the long-term needs of the users. A well-designed pier considers these access constraints from the very beginning, shaping its form and function to create a safe, efficient, and enjoyable experience for everyone who uses it. So, it's not just about sticking a platform out into the water, it's about thinking about how people and things actually get to that platform in the first place.

The selection of piers in relation to access constraints plays a significant role in determining the overall cost implications for port operations. When considering access-related pier selection, several factors come into play, each with its own financial ramifications.


Firstly, geographic location and accessibility directly influence the costs associated with transportation and logistics. Ports located farther from major trade routes or urban centers might require additional investment in infrastructure like roads, railways, or even pipelines to ensure efficient connectivity. This can significantly inflate the initial capital expenditure as well as ongoing maintenance costs.


Secondly, environmental and regulatory constraints can lead to increased costs. For instance, if a pier is situated in an ecologically sensitive area, stringent environmental regulations might necessitate advanced technology or specialized construction methods to minimize impact. These requirements often translate into higher construction costs due to the need for compliance with environmental standards and potential fines or delays if regulations are not met.


Moreover, the physical characteristics of the pier itself, such as its length, depth, and structural design, must be aligned with the types of vessels it will serve. A pier that cannot accommodate larger ships due to depth limitations might lead to lost opportunities for handling bigger cargo volumes or more lucrative contracts with shipping companies preferring deeper ports. This mismatch can result in indirect cost implications through reduced revenue potential.


Operational efficiency is another critical aspect where cost implications become evident. Piers that are selected based on ease of access for cargo handling equipment can reduce turnaround times for ships, thereby lowering demurrage charges - fees incurred when ships are delayed beyond their scheduled departure time. Efficient access also means less labor time spent on moving goods from ship to shore or vice versa, which directly affects operational costs.


Lastly, security considerations tied to access can affect costs as well. Piers that are more isolated or difficult to secure might require enhanced security measures like surveillance systems, personnel, and barriers. These security enhancements add to the operational budget but are crucial for preventing theft, vandalism, or terrorist activities that could disrupt operations and incur significant financial losses.


In conclusion, when selecting piers based on access constraints, stakeholders must weigh these various cost implications carefully. The aim should be not only to minimize direct expenses but also to consider long-term strategic benefits like scalability and sustainability of operations. By doing so, port authorities can make informed decisions that balance immediate financial outlays with future economic advantages in a globally competitive maritime environment.

Okay, lets talk about pier selection, and how those pesky access constraints can really throw a wrench in the works. Think of it like this: youve got the perfect spot picked out for a pier, picture-perfect views, ideal water depth, the whole shebang. But then reality hits. Can you even get the materials and equipment there to build it? Thats where access constraints come in, and theyre a bigger deal than you might think.


Case studies really hammer this point home. Consider a project on a remote island. Sure, the waters crystal clear, but getting heavy machinery and pre-fabricated pier sections there? Suddenly, a simple concrete pier becomes a logistical nightmare. You might be forced to consider lighter, modular designs that can be transported by barge or even helicopter. The cost skyrockets, and the design gets dictated not by the ideal engineering solution, but by whats physically possible.


Or take a scenario in a densely populated urban waterfront. Space is tight. You cant just shut down streets for weeks to bring in construction equipment. Noise restrictions become a major factor. Maybe you have to limit construction hours or use quieter (but potentially less efficient) methods. Suddenly, the "best" pier design from an engineering standpoint becomes completely impractical. You might opt for a smaller pier, built in sections off-site and then quickly assembled to minimize disruption.


These case studies highlight that access constraints arent just minor inconveniences; they fundamentally shape the pier selection process. They force engineers and planners to be creative, to think outside the box, and to prioritize practicality alongside structural integrity and aesthetic appeal. Its a balancing act, and the "best" pier is often the one that best navigates the limitations imposed by the environment and the surrounding infrastructure. So, next time youre admiring a beautiful pier, remember that its design is likely a testament to ingenuity and problem-solving in the face of some serious access challenges.

A wooden pier in Corfu, Greece

A pier is a raised structure that rises above a body of water and usually juts out from its shore, typically supported by piles or pillars, and provides above-water access to offshore areas. Frequent pier uses include fishing, boat docking and access for both passengers and cargo, and oceanside recreation. Bridges, buildings, and walkways may all be supported by architectural piers. Their open structure allows tides and currents to flow relatively unhindered, whereas the more solid foundations of a quay or the closely spaced piles of a wharf can act as a breakwater, and are consequently more liable to silting. Piers can range in size and complexity from a simple lightweight wooden structure to major structures extended over 1,600 m (5,200 ft). In American English, a pier may be synonymous with a dock.

Piers have been built for several purposes, and because these different purposes have distinct regional variances, the term pier tends to have different nuances of meaning in different parts of the world. Thus in North America and Australia, where many ports were, until recently, built on the multiple pier model, the term tends to imply a current or former cargo-handling facility. In contrast, in Europe, where ports more often use basins and river-side quays than piers, the term is principally associated with the image of a Victorian cast iron pleasure pier which emerged in Great Britain during the early 19th century. However, the earliest piers pre-date the Victorian age.

Types

[edit]

Piers can be categorized into different groupings according to the principal purpose.[1] However, there is considerable overlap between these categories. For example, pleasure piers often also allow for the docking of pleasure steamers and other similar craft, while working piers have often been converted to leisure use after being rendered obsolete by advanced developments in cargo-handling technology. Many piers are floating piers, to ensure that the piers raise and lower with the tide along with the boats tied to them. This prevents a situation where lines become overly taut or loose by rising or lowering tides. An overly taut or loose tie-line can damage boats by pulling them out of the water or allowing them so much leeway that they bang forcefully against the sides of the pier.

Working piers

[edit]
Out-of-use industrial bulk cargo Pier, Cook Inlet, Alaska.

Working piers were built for the handling of passengers and cargo onto and off ships or (as at Wigan Pier) canal boats. Working piers themselves fall into two different groups. Longer individual piers are often found at ports with large tidal ranges, with the pier stretching far enough off shore to reach deep water at low tide. Such piers provided an economical alternative to impounded docks where cargo volumes were low, or where specialist bulk cargo was handled, such as at coal piers. The other form of working pier, often called the finger pier, was built at ports with smaller tidal ranges. Here the principal advantage was to give a greater available quay length for ships to berth against compared to a linear littoral quayside, and such piers are usually much shorter. Typically each pier would carry a single transit shed the length of the pier, with ships berthing bow or stern in to the shore. Some major ports consisted of large numbers of such piers lining the foreshore, classic examples being the Hudson River frontage of New York, or the Embarcadero in San Francisco.

The advent of container shipping, with its need for large container handling spaces adjacent to the shipping berths, has made working piers obsolete for the handling of general cargo, although some still survive for the handling of passenger ships or bulk cargos. One example, is in use in Progreso, Yucatán, where a pier extends more than 4 miles into the Gulf of Mexico, making it the longest pier in the world. The Progreso Pier supplies much of the peninsula with transportation for the fishing and cargo industries and serves as a port for large cruise ships in the area. Many other working piers have been demolished, or remain derelict, but some have been recycled as pleasure piers. The best known example of this is Pier 39 in San Francisco.

At Southport and the Tweed River on the Gold Coast in Australia, there are piers that support equipment for a sand bypassing system that maintains the health of sandy beaches and navigation channels.

Pleasure piers

[edit]
Print of a Victorian pier in Margate in the English county of Kent, 1897

Pleasure piers were first built in Britain during the early 19th century.[2] The earliest structures were Ryde Pier, built in 1813/4, Trinity Chain Pier near Leith, built in 1821, Brighton Chain Pier, built in 1823.[2] and Margate Jetty 1823/24 originally a timber built pier.

Only the oldest of these piers still remains. At that time, the introduction of steamships and railways for the first time permitted mass tourism to dedicated seaside resorts. The large tidal ranges at many such resorts meant that passengers arriving by pleasure steamer could use a pier to disembark safely.[3] Also, for much of the day, the sea was not visible from the shore and the pleasure pier permitted holidaymakers to promenade over and alongside the sea at all times.[4] The world's longest pleasure pier is at Southend-on-Sea, Essex, and extends 1.3 miles (2.1 km) into the Thames Estuary.[2] The longest pier on the West Coast of the US is the Santa Cruz Wharf, with a length of 2,745 feet (837 m).[5]

Providing a walkway out to sea, pleasure piers often include amusements and theatres as part of their attractions.[4] Such a pier may be unroofed, closed, or partly open and partly closed. Sometimes a pier has two decks. Galveston Island Historic Pleasure Pier in Galveston, Texas has a roller coaster, 15 rides, carnival games and souvenir shops.[6]

Early pleasure piers were of complete timber construction, as was with Margate which opened in 1824. The first iron and timber built pleasure pier Margate Jetty, opened in 1855.[7] Margate pier was wrecked by a storm in January 1978 and not repaired.[8][7] The longest iron pleasure pier still remaining is the one at Southend. First opened as a wooden pier in 1829, it was reconstructed in iron and completed in 1889. In a 2006 UK poll, the public voted the seaside pier onto the list of icons of England.[9]

Fishing piers

[edit]

Many piers are built for the purpose of providing boatless anglers access to fishing grounds that are otherwise inaccessible.[10] Many "Free Piers" are available in larger harbors which differ from private piers. Free Piers are often primarily used for fishing. Fishing from a pier presents a set of different circumstances to fishing from the shore or beach, as you do not need to cast out into the deeper water. This being the case there are specific fishing rigs that have been created specifically for pier fishing[11] which allow for the direct access to deeper water.

Piers of the world

[edit]

Belgium

[edit]

In Blankenberge a first pleasure pier was built in 1894. After its destruction in the World War I, a new pier was built in 1933. It remained till the present day, but was partially transformed and modernized in 1999–2004.

In Nieuwpoort, Belgium there is a pleasure pier on both sides of the river IJzer.

Netherlands

[edit]
The Scheveningen Pier

Scheveningen, the coastal resort town of The Hague, boasts the largest pier in the Netherlands, completed in 1961. A crane, built on top of the pier's panorama tower, provides the opportunity to make a 60-metre (200 ft) high bungee jump over the North Sea waves. The present pier is a successor of an earlier pier, which was completed in 1901 but in 1943 destroyed by the German occupation forces.

United Kingdom

[edit]

England and Wales

[edit]

The first recorded pier in England was Ryde Pier, opened in 1814 on the Isle of Wight, as a landing stage to allow ferries to and from the mainland to berth. It is still used for this purpose today.[12] It also had a leisure function in the past, with the pier head once containing a pavilion, and there are still refreshment facilities today. The oldest cast iron pier in the world is Town Pier, Gravesend, in Kent, which opened in 1834. However, it is not recognised by the National Piers Society as being a seaside pier.[13]

Brighton Palace Pier (pictured in 2011), opened in 1899

Following the building of the world's first seaside pier at Ryde, the pier became fashionable at seaside resorts in England and Wales during the Victorian era, peaking in the 1860s with 22 being built in that decade.[14] A symbol of the typical British seaside holiday, by 1914, more than 100 pleasure piers were located around the UK coast.[2] Regarded as being among the finest Victorian architecture, there are still a significant number of seaside piers of architectural merit still standing, although some have been lost, including Margate, two at Brighton in East Sussex, one at New Brighton in the Wirral and three at Blackpool in Lancashire.[4] Two piers, Brighton's now derelict West Pier and Clevedon Pier, were Grade 1 listed. The Birnbeck Pier in Weston-super-Mare is the only pier in the world linked to an island. The National Piers Society gives a figure of 55 surviving seaside piers in England and Wales.[1] In 2017, Brighton Palace Pier was said to be the most visited tourist attraction outside London, with over 4.5 million visitors the previous year.[15]

See also

[edit]
  • Boardwalk
  • Breakwater
  • Dock
  • Jetty
  • List of piers
  • Seaside resort
  • Wharf

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Piers". National Piers Society. 2006. Archived from the original on September 29, 2008. Retrieved February 24, 2012.
  2. ^ a b c d "The expert selection: British seaside piers". No. 1 August 2014. Financial Times. 15 June 2015. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10.
  3. ^ Gladwell, Andrew (2015). "Introduction". London's Pleasure Steamers. Amberley Publishing. ISBN 978-1445641584.
  4. ^ a b c "A very British affair - the fall and rise of the seaside pier". BBC News. 16 June 2015.
  5. ^ "California Pier Statistics, Longest Piers". seecalifornia.com. Retrieved 2014-02-10.
  6. ^ Aulds, T.J. (January 28, 2012). "Landry's Corp. is close to revealing plans". News Article. Galveston Daily News. Archived from the original on January 31, 2012.
  7. ^ a b "200 years of historic British piers: in pictures". The Telegraph. Retrieved 15 June 2015
  8. ^ "The destruction of Margate jetty in the great storm of January 1978". 13 January 2018.
  9. ^ "ICONS of England - the 100 ICONS as voted by the public". Culture 24 News. 15 June 2015.
  10. ^ "Landscape Design Book" (PDF). University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2015.[permanent dead link]
  11. ^ VS, Marco (2021-03-21). "Pier Fishing Rigs: 6 Common Types of Rigs for fishing from a Pier". Pro Fishing Reviews. Retrieved 2021-10-10.
  12. ^ "Britain's best seaside piers". The Telegraph. Retrieved 15 June 2015
  13. ^ "The oldest surviving cast iron pier in the world". BBC. February 9, 2006. Retrieved March 26, 2006.
  14. ^ Dobraszczyk, Paul (2014). Iron, Ornament and Architecture in Victorian Britain: Myth and Modernity, Excess and Enchantment. Ashgate Publishing. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-472-41898-2.
  15. ^ "Brighton Palace Pier named as Britain's most visited tourist attraction outside London". Brighton and Hove News. 2 August 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2025.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Turner, K., (1999), Pier Railways and Tramways of the British Isles, The Oakwood Press, No. LP60, ISBN 0-85361-541-1.
  • Wills, Anthony; Phillips, Tim (2014). British Seaside Piers. London: English Heritage. ISBN 9781848022645.
[edit]
  • The Piers Project
  • National Piers Society
  • Details on UK Piers including Webcams

 

Shallow foundation construction example

A shallow foundation is a type of building foundation that transfers structural load to the Earth very near to the surface, rather than to a subsurface layer or a range of depths, as does a deep foundation. Customarily, a shallow foundation is considered as such when the width of the entire foundation is greater than its depth.[1] In comparison to deep foundations, shallow foundations are less technical, thus making them more economical and the most widely used for relatively light structures.

Types

[edit]

Footings are always wider than the members that they support. Structural loads from a column or wall are usually greater than 1,000 kPa, while the soil's bearing capacity is commonly less than that (typically less than 400 kPa). By possessing a larger bearing area, the foundation distributes the pressure to the soil, decreasing the bearing pressure to within allowable values.[2] A structure is not limited to one footing. Multiple types of footings may be used in a construction project.

Wall footing

[edit]

Also called strip footing, a wall footing is a continuous strip that supports structural and non-structural load-bearing walls. Found directly under the wall, Its width is commonly 2-3 times wider than the wall above it.[3]

Detail Section of a strip footing and its wall.

Isolated footing

[edit]

Also called single-column footing, an isolated footing is a square, rectangular, or circular slab that supports the structural members individually. Generally, each column is set on an individual footing to transmit and distribute the load of the structure to the soil underneath. Sometimes, an isolated footing can be sloped or stepped at the base to spread greater loads. This type of footing is used when the structural load is relatively low, columns are widely spaced, and the soil's bearing capacity is adequate at a shallow depth.

Combined footing

[edit]

When more than one column shares the same footing, it is called a combined footing. A combined footing is typically utilized when the spacing of the columns is too restricted such that if isolated footing were used, they would overlap one another. Also, when property lines make isolated footings eccentrically loaded, combined footings are preferred.

When the load among the columns is equal, the combined footing may be rectangular. Conversely, when the load among the columns is unequal, the combined footing should be trapezoidal.

Strap footing

[edit]

A strap footing connects individual columns with the use of a strap beam. The general purpose of a strap footing is alike to those of a combined footing, where the spacing is possibly limited and/or the columns are adjacent to the property lines.

Mat foundation with its concrete undergoing curing.

Mat foundation

[edit]

Also called raft foundation, a mat foundation is a single continuous slab that covers the entirety of the base of a building. Mat foundations support all the loads of the structure and transmit them to the ground evenly. Soil conditions may prevent other footings from being used. Since this type of foundation distributes the load coming from the building uniformly over a considerably large area, it is favored when individual footings are unfeasible due to the low bearing capacity of the soil.

Diagrams of the types of shallow foundations.

Slab-on-grade foundation

[edit]
Pouring a slab-on-grade foundation

Slab-on-grade or floating slab foundations are a structural engineering practice whereby the reinforced concrete slab that is to serve as the foundation for the structure is formed from formwork set into the ground. The concrete is then poured into the formwork, leaving no space between the ground and the structure. This type of construction is most often seen in warmer climates, where ground freezing and thawing is less of a concern and where there is no need for heat ducting underneath the floor. Frost Protected Shallow Foundations (or FPSF) which are used in areas of potential frost heave, are a form of slab-on-grade foundation.[4]

Remodeling or extending such a structure may be more difficult. Over the long term, ground settling (or subsidence) may be a problem, as a slab foundation cannot be readily jacked up to compensate; proper soil compaction prior to pour can minimize this. The slab can be decoupled from ground temperatures by insulation, with the concrete poured directly over insulation (for example, extruded polystyrene foam panels), or heating provisions (such as hydronic heating) can be built into the slab.

Slab-on-grade foundations should not be used in areas with expansive clay soil. While elevated structural slabs actually perform better on expansive clays, it is generally accepted by the engineering community that slab-on-grade foundations offer the greatest cost-to-performance ratio for tract homes. Elevated structural slabs are generally only found on custom homes or homes with basements.

Copper piping, commonly used to carry natural gas and water, reacts with concrete over a long period, slowly degrading until the pipe fails. This can lead to what is commonly referred to as slab leaks. These occur when pipes begin to leak from within the slab. Signs of a slab leak range from unexplained dampened carpet spots, to drops in water pressure and wet discoloration on exterior foundation walls.[5] Copper pipes must be lagged (that is, insulated) or run through a conduit or plumbed into the building above the slab. Electrical conduits through the slab must be water-tight, as they extend below ground level and can potentially expose wiring to groundwater.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Akhter, Shahin. "Shallow foundation – Definition, Types, Uses and Diagrams". Pro Civil Engineer. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  2. ^ Gillesania, Diego Inocencio T. (2004). Fundamentals of reinforced concrete design (2nd ed.). [Cebu, Cirty, Philippines]. p. 259. ISBN 971-8614-26-5. OCLC 1015901733.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ^ Mahdi, Sheikh. "8 Most Important Types of Foundation". civiltoday.com. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  4. ^ "Slab-on-Grade Foundation Detail & Insulation, Building Guide".
  5. ^ "Slab Leak Repair McKinney, Frisco, and Allen Tx - Hackler Plumbing". Hacklerplumbingmckinney.com. 2013-11-08. Retrieved 2018-08-20.
[edit]

About Cook County

Driving Directions in Cook County


Driving Directions From 42.051159627372, -88.202951526236 to
Driving Directions From 42.092671011935, -88.097873714537 to
Driving Directions From 42.027864686476, -88.178784129852 to
Driving Directions From 42.080861469688, -88.119629346452 to
Driving Directions From 42.092626312283, -88.191267040052 to
Driving Directions From 42.102378896248, -88.203932774646 to
Driving Directions From 42.101413863629, -88.180736768318 to
Driving Directions From 42.098479365503, -88.089470502033 to
Driving Directions From 42.111332166598, -88.176665125485 to
Driving Directions From 42.124515141614, -88.154087492577 to